Ecological Archives E095-278-D1

Claire H. Davies, Amelia J. Armstrong, Mark Baird, Frank Coman, Steven Edgar, Daniel Gaughan, Jack Greenwood, Felipe Gusmão, Natasha Henschke, J. Anthony Koslow, Sophie C. Leterme, A. David McKinnon, Margaret Miller, Sarah Pausina, Julian Uribe Palomino, Ruben-Lee Roennfeldt, Peter Rothlisberg, Anita Slotwinski, Joanna Strzelecki, Iain M. Suthers, Kerrie M. Swadling, Sam Talbot, Mark Tonks, David H. Tranter, Jock W. Young, Anthony J. Richardson. 2014. Over 75 years of zooplankton data from Australia. Ecology 95:3229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/14-0697.1


Introduction

Zooplankton have a fundamental role in marine ecosystems as grazers of phytoplankton, heterotrophic microbes and detritus, remineralizing organic matter and recycling nutrients in the process. Zooplankton subsidise benthic communities through the sinking of carcasses and faecal pellets, thus contributing to carbon sequestration in the deep ocean. Copepods often dominate the mesozooplankton and have been considered to be the most abundant multicellular organism on earth, with a biomass of 46.8 × 109 tonnes (Mauchline 1998, Schminke 2007). Pelagic tunicates, such as appendicularia, have among the fastest growth rates of any metazoan (Hopcroft and Roff 1995). Because of their abundance and rapid turnover, zooplankton are sensitive indicators of ecosystem health, providing insights into impacts of climate change, ocean acidification, eutrophication and pollution. Though most of our knowledge of the ecological role of zooplankton is based on short-term studies, the demonstrated utility of zooplankton as ecosystem indicators is based on long-term plankton time series such as the Continuous Plankton Recorder survey in the North Atlantic and the California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations survey in the eastern Pacific (Edwards et al. 2010).

Despite Australia having one of the largest marine jurisdictions in the world, there were relatively few biological time series and no zooplankton time series longer than two years prior to 2008. As in other countries, most marine research has been conducted on specific research cruises or during short-term laboratory studies, which by their nature form a patchwork of knowledge of different taxa, regions and seasons. In response, in 2008 the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) commenced a systematic program to monitor Australia's oceans. This program includes a component focused on zooplankton and includes monthly sampling at nine National Reference Stations around the country, together with a regional Continuous Plankton Recorder survey, which generates both spatial coverage and time series.

Here we have compiled all available data on the abundance of marine zooplankton species in Australia from multiple sources, including IMOS, research publications, unpublished reports, private databases and student theses. The compiled data set has 98,676 records from 38 projects and includes more than1,000 taxa. It covers the entire coastal and shelf region of Australia and dates back to 1938. To facilitate analysis across the multiple data sets, species names have been standardized according to the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS; http://www.marinespecies.org/about.php) and all abundances converted to abundance per m3. Anomalous or unsubstantiated data have been removed. Most of the records are for copepods (70,395), but there are also data for other zooplankton groups including adult and larval decapods (4,649), chaetognaths (2,999), appendicularians (2,713), thaliaceans (1,752) and cladocerans (1,695), amongst others. Wherever possible, metadata are provided for each record, including dates, locations and information on sampling methods such as mesh size. Some of these data have previously been used to generate species distribution maps for the Australian Taxonomic Guide and Atlas (Richardson et al. 2013; Swadling et al. 2013).

We encourage others holding additional zooplankton data for the region to contact us and contribute their data so we can periodically publish updates. It is hoped that this national data set, representing much longer time periods and larger spatial scales than can be collected through individual surveys, will be useful in studies of biodiversity, biogeography, climate change, and ecosystem health.

Metadata

Class I. Data set descriptors

A. Data set identity: The Australian Zooplankton Database

B. Data set identification code:

CSIRO MarLIN record number: 14178

Anzlic Identifier: ANZCW0306014178

C. Data set description

Principal Investigators:

Associate Professor Anthony J. Richardson
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship
EcoSciences Precinct, GPO Box 2583, Dutton Park 4001, Qld, Australia
anthony.richardson@csiro.au
Centre for Applications in Natural Resource Mathematics (CARM)
School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Qld, Australia
a.richardson@maths.uq.edu.au

Claire Davies
Plankton biologist
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship
Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
claire.davies@csiro.au

Abstract: Zooplankton are the key trophic link between primary producers and fish in pelagic ecosystems. Historically, there are few zooplankton time series in Australia, with no data sets longer than two years prior to 2008. Here we compile 98 676 abundance records of more than 1000 zooplankton taxa from unpublished research cruises, student projects, published literature, and the recent integrated marine observing system (IMOS). This data set covers the entire coastal and shelf region of Australia and dates back to 1938. Most records are for copepods, but there are also data for other taxa such as decapods, chaetognaths, thaliaceans, appendicularians, and cladocerans. Metadata are provided for each record, including dates, coordinates, and information on mesh size and sampling methods. To facilitate analysis across the multiple data sets, we have updated the species names according to the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and converted units to abundance per cubic meter. These data will be valuable for studies of biodiversity, biogeography, impacts of climate change, and ecosystem health. We encourage researchers holding additional Australian zooplankton data to contact us and contribute their data to the data set so we can periodically publish updates.

D. Key words: biogeography; continuous plankton recorder; copepod; diversity; integrated marine observing system (IMOS); plankton; species richness; zooplankton abundance.

 

Class II. Research origin descriptors

A. Project description

Identity: The Australian Zooplankton Database

Period of Study: 1938-2014

Objectives:To collate all marine zooplankton abundance data from Australia waters – with standardized taxonomy and units – into one repository and make it available to the research community.

Sources of funding:The major effort in collating these data has been conducted by staff at CSIRO through funding from IMOS. IMOS is supported by the Australian Commonwealth Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy and the Super Science Initiative.

Funding for the field collection of the original data has come from many different sources, as this is a collation of data from various projects around Australia. The contributing institutions and details about each separate data set are available in the file zooplankton_metadata.csv.

Study region: Data cover the coastal, shelf and oceanic waters of Australia (Fig 1). The boundary box of the data is:

Latitude min: -45

Latitude max: -2

Longitude min: 110

Longitude max: 160

 

Fig1

Fig. 1. Sample positions for each project.


 

Experimental or sampling design: Data have been collected using different equipment and sampling designs. Zooplankton have been generally collected by net, although Project 597 has used a Continuous Plankton Recorder. Nets used have varying mesh sizes and we have included these where available. Data have been sourced from research cruises, student projects, published literature and time series surveys. Details of each project are described in the file zooplankton_metadata.csv. These metadata should allow users to understand how the data compare with those from other projects when analyzing across data sets.

The taxonomic resolution for each project varies according to the aims of each specific survey. This can be especially important when using the data to interpret absences. Absences can be (a) true where the analyst did not find the target taxa, or (b) not truly representative; when the taxa were not sampled for or identified at low resolution (e.g., copepod naupliar lifestages), or the analyst did not look for the particular taxa and presence or absence was not determined. The resolution to which each data set was counted is detailed in the file zooplankton_metadata.csv. We recommend that if a taxon is not mentioned within a project then a real absence should not be interpreted. If a taxon is mentioned in some samples and not others, from within the same data set, a real absence can be inferred.

Taxonomy and systematics: All species names have been verified in the process of uploading the data. Each species name has been updated to the current accepted scientific name according to WoRMS (World Register of Marine Species). For taxa where species identifications cannot be confirmed, a higher taxonomic level has been applied. Much of the data set also includes information on gender for copepods because species identification usually necessitates determination of gender. Taxonomic sheets, which provide species identifications and distribution maps, have been published for many of the common species (mainly copepods) included here and can be found at the Australian Zooplankton Taxonomic Guide and Atlas website (Richardson et al. 2013, Swadling et al. 2013).

All data have been standardised to abundance (number per m3 of water filtered) and are therefore comparable across data sets (within the constraints of mesh size and sampling procedures). The sample depth and the water depth at the sample location have been included as fields in the data file so the user can to convert to abundance per m² using whichever depth is relevant to their requirements. This will increase the usability of the data set and improve comparability between shallow and deep tows and locations. The Australian Bathymetry and Topography, June 2009 (http://www.ga.gov.au/corporate_data/67703/Rec2009_021.pdf) and ETOPO2v2 2006 (http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/relief/ETOPO2/ETOPO2v2-2006/) were used to estimate the water depth for each sample location.

We have given the average total length of adult copepods, since copepods have determinate growth, and the body size data is easily available and accepted. The juvenile size is assumed as the smallest adult size in the range given for the adult of that species. The majority of the copepod length data has been compiled from Bradford-Grieve et al. (1999) and the marine planktonic copepod website (Razouls et al. 2005-2014). Other sources were Ruth Böttger-Schnack via personal communications for Oncaeaidae and Frost and Fleminger (1968) for Clausocalanus. Size coefficients are not given for other taxa, for which the sizes are not well known and can vary greatly depending on age (not recorded in the datasets) or environmental conditions.

Surveys pertaining only to ichthyoplankton have not been included in this data set. They potentially warrant a separate database due to the volume of data available and there is already a considerable amount of data synthesis in this field.

Data verification: Anomalous data, with uncertain species identifications, locations on land, or data with missing values have been excluded from the data set.

Exact sampling dates were not known for some projects and had to be estimated for Projects 18, 24, 29, and 615 from information given in the associated literature. The sampling date range is given in the file zooplankton_metadata.csv. The temporal resolution of the sampling is detailed in the sample_year, sample_month, sample_day and sample_time_UTC fields of the file zooplankton_metadata.csv. Exact sampling locations were not known for some of the sampling sites in Project 615. These have been inferred from figures showing the ships track and sampling locations. These data will be adequate for use in long-term time series or mapping distribution, but care will be needed if associating these values with contemporaneous environmental variables.

Data set usage history: Some of the included data have been used in the Australian Marine Zooplankton Taxonomic Guide and Atlas to map species distributions (Richardson et al. 2013, Swadling et al. 2013) and to provide initial comparisons of tropical copepod communities (McKinnon and Duggan 2014). Large-scale analysis of these data has not yet been undertaken, but it is hoped that the publication of this data set will facilitate further analysis. Most of the projects have been analysed for the purpose for which they were collected and published. Details of these publications and the projects can be found in the file zooplankton_metadata.csv.

Project personnel: Same as authors

 

Class III. Data set status and accessibility

A. Status

Latest update:July 2014

Latest Archive date:July 2014

Metadata status: July 2014, metadata and links to further metadata supplied in zooplankton_metadata.csv

B. Accessibility

Storage location and medium:

The Ecological Society of America's Ecological Archives as a .csv file.

Stored and archived by the CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship data centre. Dutton Park: DIGITAL – Database Files – Oracle.

Contact person:

Claire Davies

Plankton biologist

CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship

Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia

claire.davies@csiro.au

Copyright restrictions:None

Proprietary restrictions: None

Disclaimer and acknowledgments: If using data from Project 599 the National Reference Stations or 597 the Australian Continuous Plankton Recorder, please use the following acknowledgement: "Data sourced from the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) – IMOS is supported by the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy and the Super Science Initiative."

If most of the database is used or it is used as a whole, please acknowledge this publication, if individual project data is used, please acknowledge use of data as per the custodian information in the zooplankton_metadata.csv file.

Costs: None

Class IV. Data structural descriptors

A. Data Set File

Identity:

zooplankton_abundance_data.csv

zooplankton_metadata.csv

Size:

Zooplankton_abundance_data.csv

No of records: 98,676

No of bytes: 13,990 kb

Zooplankton_metadata.csv

No of records: 38 (one record per project)

No of bytes: 15 kb

Header information

Field information for zooplankton_abundance_data.csv

Project_id – Unique project identifying number

Taxon_name – Taxonomic name given to specimen in database

Functional_group – Functional group of specimen, i.e., calanoid, appendicularian, decapod, etc.

Family – Taxonomic family of specimen as defined by WoRMS

Genus – Taxonomic genus of specimen as defined by WoRMS

Species – Taxonomic species of specimen as defined by WoRMS

Lifestage – The lifestage of the taxon, including sex description where known

Abundance_m3 – Number of specimens in a cubic metre of water (individuals per m3)

Water_depth_m – Water depth in metres at the sampling location. If null, the location was possibly too close to land for the resolution of the bathymetry sources to interpolate.

Nominal_depth_m – Maximum depth of a vertical sample in meters, average tow depth of a horizontal sample in metres or null if depth is unknown

Avg_size_mm – The average total length (tip of head to end of caudal rami) of a copepod in mm. Null for all other taxa.

Latitude – Latitude where specimen was found in decimal degrees

Longitude – Longitude where the specimen was found in decimal degrees

Sample_year – Year in which sampling took place

Sample_month – Month in which sampling took place, null if the date resolution is year

Sample_day – Day on which sampling took place, null if the date resolution is month

Sample_time_UTC – Full sampling date in UTC

Field information for zooplankton_metadata.csv

Project_id – Unique project identifying number

Project_description – Short description of the project

Resolution – The taxonomic resolution applicable to the project

No_records – The number of records for the project

No_samples – The number of samples taken in the project

Custodian_name – Source of the project data

Custodian_affiliation – Affiliation of the contributing author

Custodian_email – Contact email for the data custodian

Reference – Publication reference or citation for further project information

Net_type – Type of net used for the sampling

Net_diameter – Diameter of net used for sampling, where known or applicable, in metres

Net_mesh_size – Mesh size of net used for sampling, where known or applicable, in microns

Depth_min – Minimum depth of sampling, in metres

Depth_max – Maximum depth of sampling, in metres

Min_latitude – Minimum latitude for boundary box of project sample sites

Max_latitude – Maximum latitude for boundary box of project sample sites

Min_longitude – Minimum longitude for boundary box of project sample sites

Max_longitude – Maximum longitude for boundary box of project sample sites

Sample_start_date – First sample date for the project

Sample_end_date – Final sample date for the project

 

Literature cited

Bradford-Grieve, J. M., E. L. Markhaseva, C. E. F. Rocha, and B. Abiahy. 1999. Copepoda. Pages 869–1098 in D. Boltovskoy, editor. South Atlantic Zooplankton. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Edwards, M., G. Beaugrand, G. C. Hays, J. A. Koslow, and A. J. Richardson. 2010. Multi-decadal oceanic ecological datasets and their application in marine policy and management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25:602–610.

Frost, B. and A. Fleminger. 1968. A revision of the genus Clausocalanus (Copepoda: Calanoida) with remarks on distributional patterns in diagnostic characters. Bulletin of Scripps Institution of Oceanography 12:1–235.

Hopcroft, R. R., and J. C. Roff. 1995. Zooplankton growth rates - extraordinary production by the larvacean Oikopleura dioica in tropical waters. Journal of Plankton Research 17:205–220.

Mauchline, J. 1998. The Biology of Calanoid Copepods: Key to Genera of Platycopioid and Calanoid Copepods. Advances in Marine Biology 33:65–97.

McKinnon, A. D., and S. Duggan. 2014. Community ecology of tropical marine pelagic copepods. Pages 25–50 in L. Seuront, editor. Copepods: Diversity, Habitat and Behavior. Nova Science Publishers Inc., Hauppauge, New York.

Razouls, C., F. de Bovée, J. Kouwenberg, and N. Desreumaux. 2005-2014. Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Marine Planktonic Copepods. Accessed on 18-07-2014. http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr/en/index.php

Richardson, A. J., C. Davies, A. Slotwinski, F. Coman, M. Tonks, W. Rochester, N. Murphy, J. Beard, A. McKinnon, D. V. P. Conway, and K. M. Swadling. 2013. Australian Marine Zooplankton: Taxonomic Sheets. Page 294. University of Tasmania.

Schminke, H. K. 2007. Entomology for the copepodologist. Journal of Plankton Research 29:i149–i162.

Swadling, K. M., A. Slotwinski, C. Davies, J. Beard, A. McKinnon, F. Coman, N. Murphy, M. Tonks, W. Rochester, D. V. P. Conway, G. W. Hosie, and A. J. Richardson. 2013. Australian Marine Zooplankton: a taxonomic guide and atlas. University of Tasmania.


[Back to E095-278]