Ecological Archives E094-153-A1
Martha M. Ellis, Elizabeth E. Crone. 2013. The role of transient dynamics in stochastic population growth for nine perennial plants. Ecology 94:1681–1686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-0028.1
Appendix A. Details on populations and species used with indices and results from transient and stochastic analyses.
Species | Spp code | Population | Years | Mean obs r | AMP | ATT | Cor(VR, obs) | Cor(TD, obs) | Cor(TD, VR) | Original source |
Aspasia principissa | ASPR | ASPR-1 | 8 | -0.067 | 0.203 | -0.201 | 0.37 | 0.838 | -0.197 | Zotz and Schmidt, Biological Conservation 129 (2006):82–90. |
Astragalus scaphoides | ASSC | ASSC-haynes | 11 | -0.056 | 0.511 | -0.272 | 0.69 | 0.719 | -0.007 | Lesica,Western North American Naturalist 55.2 (1995):142–150. |
Astragalus scaphoides | ASSC | ASSC-mcdevi | 9 | 0.172 | 0.891 | -0.531 | 0.596 | 0.812 | 0.014 | Lesica,Western North American Naturalist 55.2 (1995):142–150. |
Astragalus scaphoides | ASSC | ASSC-sheep | 11 | 0.072 | 0.867 | -0.32 | 0.374 | 0.702 | -0.398 | Lesica,Western North American Naturalist 55.2 (1995):142–150. |
Astragalus tyghensis | ASTY | ASTY-1 | 9 | -0.117 | 1.446 | -0.656 | 0.38 | 0.526 | -0.587 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003): 1464–1476. |
Astragalus tyghensis | ASTY | ASTY-2 | 9 | 0.022 | 1.273 | -1.156 | 0.871 | 0.3 | -0.208 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Astragalus tyghensis | ASTY | ASTY-3 | 9 | -0.011 | 1.886 | -1.11 | 0.799 | 0.733 | 0.176 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Astragalus tyghensis | ASTY | ASTY-4 | 9 | -0.038 | 1.158 | -1.003 | 0.527 | 0.661 | -0.289 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Astragalus tyghensis | ASTY | ASTY-5 | 9 | -0.081 | 0.542 | -0.796 | 0.754 | 0.751 | 0.132 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Dicerandra frutescens | DIFR | DIFR-19 | 10 | -0.351 | 3.423 | -1.288 | 0.846 | 0.345 | -0.208 | Menges et al.,Biological conservation127.1 (2006):115–127. |
Dicerandra frutescens | DIFR | DIFR-2 | 12 | -0.117 | 3.999 | -0.616 | 0.771 | -0.069 | -0.688 | Menges et al.,Biological conservation127.1 (2006):115–127. |
Dicerandra frutescens | DIFR | DIFR-4 | 9 | -0.254 | 4.312 | -0.719 | 0.848 | -0.051 | -0.573 | Menges et al.,Biological conservation127.1 (2006):115–127. |
Eryngium cuneifolium | ERCU | ERCU-85 | 9 | 0.115 | 6.771 | -0.858 | 0.819 | 0.467 | -0.125 | Menges and Quintana-Ascencio, Ecological Monographs74.1 (2004):79–99. |
Haplopappus radiatus | HARA | HARA-OUT-1 | 9 | -0.015 | 1.227 | -1.397 | 0.967 | 0.493 | 0.256 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Haplopappus radiatus | HARA | HARA-OUT-2 | 9 | -0.16 | 1.105 | -1.87 | 0.941 | 0.548 | 0.232 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Haplopappus radiatus | HARA | HARA-OUT-3 | 9 | -0.057 | 0.459 | -1.488 | 0.899 | 0.285 | -0.164 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Haplopappus radiatus | HARA | HARA-OUT-4 | 9 | -0.181 | 0.913 | -1.899 | 0.867 | 0.307 | -0.208 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Haplopappus radiatus | HARA | HARA-OUT-5 | 9 | -0.092 | 1.178 | -0.979 | 0.907 | 0.289 | -0.141 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Helianthemum juliae | HEJU | HEJU-1 | 9 | 0.194 | 0.604 | -0.413 | 0.835 | 0.899 | 0.51 | Marrero-Gmez et al. Biological conservation136.4 (2007):552–562. |
Lomatium bradshawii | LOBR | LOBR-1 | 9 | -0.075 | 1.128 | -1.134 | 0.907 | 0.672 | 0.299 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Lomatium bradshawii | LOBR | LOBR-2 | 9 | -0.236 | 0.677 | -0.614 | 0.248 | 0.912 | -0.172 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Lomatium bradshawii | LOBR | LOBR-3 | 9 | -0.11 | 1.478 | -0.878 | 0.715 | 0.801 | 0.154 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Lomatium bradshawii | LOBR | LOBR-4 | 9 | 0.088 | 1.451 | -0.728 | 0.687 | 0.839 | 0.182 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Lomatium bradshawii | LOBR | LOBR-5 | 9 | 0.072 | 1.347 | -0.826 | 0.884 | 0.688 | 0.27 | Kaye and Pyke, Ecology 84.6 (2003):1464–1476. |
Silene spaldingii | SISP | SISP-1 | 12 | 0.028 | 0.293 | -1.485 | 0.773 | 0.77 | 0.192 | Lesica and Crone,Journal of Ecology95.6 (2007):1360–1369. |
Variable definitions
Species name – Species used in analysis
Species code – 4 letter code used in figures and results
Population – Population code, original population information retained with possible.
Years – Number of annual transition matrices
Mean obs r – long-term mean stochastic population growth rate
AMP – reactivity (first step amplification) of the population mean matrix
ATT – first step attenuation of the population mean matrix
Cor(VR, obs) – correlation between overall population growth rate (r.obs) and population growth due to demographic variation alone (r.VR)
Cor(TD, obs) – correlation between overall population growth rate (r.obs) and population growth due to transient responses alone (r.TD)
Cor(TD, VR) – correlation between growth rate due to demographic variation alone (r.VR) and transient responses alone (r.TD)
Original source – Citation for the original publication of matrix results for each species
Literature cited
Kaye, T., and D. Pyke. 2003. The effect of stochastic technique on estimates of population viability from transition matrix models. Ecology 84:1464–1476.
Lesica, P. 1995. Demography of Astragalus scaphoides and effects of herbivory on population growth. Western North American Naturalist 55(2):142–150.
Lesica, P., and E. E. Crone. 2007. Causes and consequences of prolonged dormancy for an iteroparous geophyte, Silene spaldingii. Journal of Ecology 95(6):1360–1369.
Marrero-Gómez, M. V., Oostermeijer, J. G. B., Carqué-Álamo, E., and Bañares-Baudet, Á. 2007. Population viability of the narrow endemic Helianthemum juliae (CISTACEAE) in relation to climate variability. Biological conservation 136(4):552–562.
Menges, E. S., and Quintana-Ascencio, P. F. 2004. Population viability with fire in Eryngium cuneifolium: deciphering a decade of demographic data. Ecological Monographs 74(1):79–99.
Menges, E. S., Quintana Ascencio, P. F., Weekley, C. W., and Gaoue, O. G. 2006. Population viability analysis and fire return intervals for an endemic Florida scrub mint. Biological Conservation 127(1):115–127.
Zotz, G., and G. Schmidt. 2006. Population decline in the epiphytic orchid Aspasia principissa. Biological Conservation 129(1):82–90.