ࡱ >
\ p None B a = c @ = Z ?N*8 X" 1 Arial1 Arial1 Arial1 Arial1 Arial1 Arial1 Arial General ` C Table 2 NMDA Sample Conc. pg/μl Response Average SD RSD% 1 2 3 0.25 101.4 92.4 108.0 100.6 7.8 2.5 481.0 433,5 510.6 475.0 38.9 8.2 5 1071.4 999.7 1137.4 1069.5 68.9 6.4 10 2649.2 2390.5 2825.5 2621.7 218.8 8.3 25 5579.2 5085.9 6054.0 5573.2 484.1 8.7 50 12956.4 11717.1 14243.7 12972.4 1263.3 9.7o l-Asp 1 300.2 288.4 296.3 295.0 6.0 2.0 1500.3 1425.6 1521.4 1482.4 50.3 3.4 9900.4 9852.1 9745.0 9832.5 79.5 0.8 21900.8 21105.3 22001.3 21669.1 490.8 2.3 125 51478.1 50421.4 51235.1 51044.9 553.5 1.1o d-Asp 50.7 54.88 45.5 4.7 9.4 82.4 75.60 87.4 81.8 5.9 7.2 309.3 323.70 282.1 305.0 21.1 6.9 579.3 620.46 625.9 608.6 25.5 4.2 80 823.6 876.54 866.1 855.4 28.0 3.3 1440.4 1526.87 1469.2 49.9 Compound LOD (pg/μl) LOQ (pg/μl) Linear range (pg/μl) Matrix effect %h d-Asp 0.52 1.57 1 1 2 5 11h l-Asp 0.46 1.41 14 NMDA 0.54 1.64 0 . 2 5 5 0 15 Linearity (R2) Recovery ± RSD (%) Standard
Matrix 50 pg/μl 100 pg/μl 200 pg/μl 0.998 0.996 73.91.1 87.89.4 106.81.3 0.994 0.992 75.91.3 86.19.8 108.21.1 0.993 74.91.5 82.49.1 104.11.6
d MbP?_ % # * + &P &F